Look beyond the total.
We investigate the relationship between the work an agent performs, the resources it consumes, and the cost that follows. The review starts with the evidence available for that workload.
OUR APPROACH
Evidence first.
Intelligence where it counts.
We use Claude Opus 5.5 as part of our analysis workflow to help investigate agent costs and reason through possible improvements. The aim is simple: turn a confusing bill into a useful next action.
01Cost evidence
Understand the workload
02Claude Opus 5.5
Investigate and reason
03Practical recommendations
Review and validate
HOW WE USE CLAUDE
A reasoning partner
for the investigation.
Agent behavior can be harder to explain than token totals. Claude helps us connect the evidence and consider what should change.
About Claude OpusConnect patterns to possible fixes.
Claude Opus 5.5 supports analysis of cost patterns and candidate improvements. We keep the public description at this level to protect customer context and the details of our workflow.
Give the team something to act on.
The goal is a recommendation tied to a cause, with clear assumptions and a way to evaluate the change. A model-generated suggestion is a starting point for review.
WHAT MAKES A RECOMMENDATION USEFUL
Clear reasoning. A measurable next step.
Evidence behind the number
A cost claim should be tied to usage and pricing evidence. Estimates and measured outcomes need to be distinguishable.
Quality alongside cost
A cheaper run is useful only if it still does the job. Task quality belongs in the decision about a proposed change.
People in control
Recommendations give your team a next step to assess. CI gates and automated fix proposals remain on our product roadmap.
We share the principles behind our work. Customer traces, prompts, task details, and internal analysis instructions are not part of this public overview. Discuss the data scope for your review directly with Ashutosh.
Want to discuss the approach for your agents?
Start with a conversation about your agents and your spend.